FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
A quick guide to the most common questions about the public platform and core workflows.
It is built for conference operations, including submissions, review cycles, registration, invoicing, payment proofs, and public conference pages.
Yes. Editors can assign reviewers, follow responses, monitor review progress, and continue through revision stages.
Yes. Revision requests and revised submissions stay within the same paper workflow.
Yes. Participant categories, invoices, payment proofs, and verification can be handled inside the conference workspace.
Yes. A conference page can show dates, venue, organizer details, and participation links.
Yes. The platform supports role-based access for editors, reviewers, authors, and participants.
Yes. Final checks and file validation can remain connected to the editorial process.
The fastest path is to request a demo or contact the team with your event structure and goals.
Need more help?
Talk to the team.
If your event has a specific structure, we can help you map the right workflow.
